Overshadowing

1 min read
2
Shadows caused by tall building in the area of Clapham Junction

One of the concern often raised by objection is the case of shadowing caused by tall buildings.

As stated in one of the recent comment:

The study includes a picture of the overshadowing at 10.00 am as well as 12 pm however no picture is shown for the hours of the afternoon i.e. 3 pm and or 6 pm.
This needs to be added to the study to provide a complete picture of potential overshadowing.

A simple view of the neighbourhood on Google map shows the extend of shadows on buildings about 15 storey high. So you can easily imagine the consequences for 42 stories

Did you like reading this article? Help us writing more!

CJAG website has been publishing local news for more than 14 years and remains committed to providing local community information and public interest journalism.

We aim to feature as much as possible on community campaigns and initiatives, local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents and helping residents.

We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more.

Until recently, all stories, analysis and reports published have been made with the great help of many volunteers. However, at the end of the day it cost time and efforts and we are frustrated that we cannot do more: there are many subjects that we would like to cover but we need financial resources to help us providing regular information.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

2 ways of supporting our project

Do you think what we are doing is helping the community and you want to encourage us to do more? We have set up two ways of supporting our project:

  1. Paypal: For one-off contributions, you can just use your bank card. However if you wish to encourage and support us regularly with a small amount, you will need a Paypal account to set up a monthly subscription. Click here to donate.
  2. Patreon: this is a well-known membership platform that connects content creators with supporters. Mainly, it offers financial tools that let supporters subscribe to projects that give creators a predictable income stream as they continue to create content. Click here to subscribe and support us regularly.

If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

CJAG News editor and Clapham Junction Action Group co-founder and coordinator since 2008, Cyril has lived in Clapham Junction since 2001.
He is also funder and CEO of Habilis-Digital Ltd, a digital agency creating and managing websites and Internet solutions.

2 Comments

  1. While the Google tool is an interesting one for general browsing on the internet it is insufficiently accurate for proper evaluation of town planning applications involving proposals for buildings.
    There are well established procedures for measuring the effect of proposals on sunlight, daylight and overshadowing. These are used in the analysis of the effect of new projects.
    In essence the main question is whether a new proposal will have enough effect to make the amenity of an existing building sufficiently unacceptable. There are laid down standards for such things and this is why applicants have to provide sunlight and daylight studies with larger applications.
    The standards include specific dates and times as well.
    The position of an application site is also of relevance. In the case of the Clapham Junction application the proposal is immediately to the south (ie the sun side) of a large expanse of railway track which is uninhabited and likely to remain so.
    The proposal includes two new taller buildings with a gap between. In simple terms this means that shadows cast by the lower streys are unlikely to have any effect at all, whilst the effect of shadows of the taller storeys will be ameliorated by the gap between.
    The consultant’s report will have assessed the effect according to the national standards.
    It’s important to use the proper tools and not to allow emotion exagerate the situation.

  2. architecturerosemont> I agree that the Google tool is not for technical and detail statement. However, it gives a good idea of the shadow provoked by tall buildings.
    In addition, albeit giving interesting rudimentary on the impact of having two towers including a gap in between, your comment does not give explanation for the lack of study on other hours of the day/other time.
    Rather that using standards and regulations (you know in your expertise they often change) I ask here a little bit of imagination…

Comments are closed.