Peabody phase 3: will they listen?

2 mins read

The change announced in April 2012 has now materialised. It confirmed the previous announcement that Peabody has selected Mount Anvil as its joint partner for the final phase. As the initial scheme was designed more than 10 years ago, it is sensible to revisit the plans in view of the experience in phase 1 and 2. 

The leaflet they have distributed to present the new project is vague (as a PR exercise, the idea is for the respondent to think they have a say), but Peabody mentioned at a resident steering group early this year that the new application to Wandsworth would involve greater height to the present application. In the meantime, images present an opportunity to reduce the width of the buildings (moving them forward?).

However, they seem to have learned from their experience with phase 2 and dealing with damage made to neighbouring properties in Comyn Road as it says: “Ensure neighbouring buildings are protected“.

They are planning to submit two planning applications for Phase 3:

  1. End of 2021 for internal changes to the layouts of the new homes and architectural design changes to the approved scheme.
  2. End of 2022 with a separate application that will primarily explore changes to buildings fronting St John’s Hill, as well as changing the landscaping to the public space and commercial uses.

WG-20120726: Approval for estate's rebuild is a failureI understand the need of some PR at some extent, but why they write: “Hawkins\Brown, the architect originally chosen by the residents” is just flabbergasting. Most of the local residents will still remember that they totally opposed the original plan promoted by Peabody and designed by Hawkins\Brown, and the local Councillors presented a global objection before the Planning Application Committee at the time. SHAME, shouted the audience when it was approved in 2012!

More delay: how a 7-year project could turn out into 14 years

With the current projected timeline, submission including the redesign of the blocks might happen at the end of 2022. As this is the biggest part of the project (with frontage along St John’s Hill, it seems reasonable to expect a completion after 2025.

Peabody redevelopment in St John’s Hill was originally approved in July 2012 after a large campaign to oppose the proposal and local newspapers naming the plan “controversial”.

The original schedule was:

  1. January: consultation
  2. February 2012: Planning Application
  3. Late Spring 2012: Planning Consent
  4. End of 2012: Start
  5. 2018/19: Completion

Phase 1 was only achieved in 2016 (already late) but then Peabody decided to put a temporary hold on the development, blaming .estimated build cost significant increase (and because units were not selling well on the private market). 

In autumn 2017 they submitted an amended scheme for the remaining of the construction, with taller buildings, implying it was a condition to continue the development. They knew the Council was desperately needing social housing and the application was approved in February 2018, as we predicted.

And then… nothing for nearly 2 years! The construction site remained desperately empty as a no-man’s land! Brexit played probably a part, but risk assessment is part of good planning.

Construction work started again for phase 2 in early 2020, with a goal to complete in Spring 2022 with  final completion of phase 3 in early 2025 (i.e. 13 years after their project was approved and double the initial schedule approved).

  • Peabody has invited people to comment and contact them by email:
  • The leaflet can be downloaded on their website.


Did you like reading this article? Help us write more!

Clapham Junction Insider (formerly known as the CJAG website) has been publishing local news for over 14 years and remains committed to providing information about the local community and engaging in public interest journalism.

Our goal is to feature a wide range of community campaigns and initiatives, local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, and provide assistance to residents.

We have always been dedicated to these endeavours and have no intention of changing. In fact, we would like to expand our efforts further.

Until recently, all the stories, analyses, and reports published have been made possible with the invaluable help of many volunteers. However, it requires a significant amount of time and effort, and we are frustrated that we cannot do more. There are numerous topics we would like to cover, but we require financial resources to provide regular information.

Therefore, we kindly ask our readers to consider offering financial support to sustain these efforts. Any contributions made will help support community and public interest news, as well as the expansion of our coverage in this area.

2 ways of supporting our project

Do you think what we are doing is helping the community and you want to encourage us to do more? We have set up two ways of supporting our project:

  1. Paypal: For one-off contributions, you can just use your bank card. However if you wish to encourage and support us regularly with a small amount, you will need a Paypal account to set up a monthly subscription. Click here to donate.
  2. Patreon: this is a well-known membership platform that connects content creators with supporters. Mainly, it offers financial tools that let supporters subscribe to projects that give creators a predictable income stream as they continue to create content. Click here to subscribe and support us regularly.

If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

CJI editor and Clapham Junction Action Group co-founder and coordinator since 2008, Cyril has lived in Clapham Junction since 2001.
He is also funder and CEO of Habilis-Digital Ltd, a digital agency creating and managing websites and Internet solutions.