David and Goliath in Northcote Road?

2 mins read
2

Urgent! If you want to respond to this planning application, you have only until Friday next week, 15 February, to post objections.

If only David could win! David: twenty or so homes (Bramfield Road, Northcote Road, Staplehurst Court and Halston Close). Goliath: Wandsworth Council.

The residents of these homes will suffer a dramatic reduction in the quality of their lives if the Council proceeds with its plan to redevelop the current Chatham Hall site.

In 2017 the Council conducted a consultation process about their proposal: closure of the current Northcote Library (to be replaced by retail and residential space) and demolition of the current Chatham Hall and nearby garages (to be replaced by the erection of a new Northcote Library and a building combining community centre facilities and flats).

During the consultation a majority of local residents (including people not directly affected but who wanted to retain the special nature of the area) opposed the redevelopment plan. (Note that the local residents were not against the idea of a new, improved library and community centre – just the scale of the development and the impact it would have).

Residents’ concerns included the disproportionately huge size of the replacement for Chatham Hall in an area of low-rise buildings. More personally, the residents were worried about loss of light and privacy plus noise and security issues posed by the development. They queried the necessity of so many flats.

READ ALSO: Council’s proposal for a new Northcote Library opposed by residents

However, Wandsworth Council has just published its plans for the development. You can view them as follows:

www.wandsworth.gov.uk/planning.
In the box ‘Planning quick search’ enter 2018/5833
>> Click View Associated Application Documents & Make Online Comments for Live Applications

READ ALSO: Replacement of Northcote library has been given the thumbs up by Tory Councillors

From the plans (with some differences from the previous consulted plans), one can see that although some concessions have been made, the community centre facilities and flats will still constitute a bulky and overbearing building.

Other aspects continue to concern the residents:

  • It seems that the Council has omitted to carry out a full daylight and sunlight assessment.  Even at this stage (i.e. before completing the assessment), the website report indicates that some households will lose light to an ‘adverse’ extent.
  • Also, distance between the building with the community centre and flats and the Bramfield Road properties will be distressingly short. Windows of the flats above the new community centre facilities will be only 15 metres from the windows of the facing Bramfield Road houses. Note that official guidelines recommend a longer distance. For example, The London Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) (page 83) states:

“…In the past, planning guidance for privacy has been concerned with achieving visual separation between dwellings by setting a minimum distance of 18-21 metres between facing homes.”

Residents appreciate that the redevelopment per se is a positive one. However, they would like the Council to consider the issues of light and privacy, and ‘go back to the drawing board’! Maybe David can win?

If you wish to object to the plans, please go to the site and post your objections – by 15 February!

Did you like reading this article? Help us writing more!

CJAG website has been publishing local news for more than 14 years and remains committed to providing local community information and public interest journalism.

We aim to feature as much as possible on community campaigns and initiatives, local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents and helping residents.

We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more.

Until recently, all stories, analysis and reports published have been made with the great help of many volunteers. However, at the end of the day it cost time and efforts and we are frustrated that we cannot do more: there are many subjects that we would like to cover but we need financial resources to help us providing regular information.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

2 ways of supporting our project

Do you think what we are doing is helping the community and you want to encourage us to do more? We have set up two ways of supporting our project:

  1. Paypal: For one-off contributions, you can just use your bank card. However if you wish to encourage and support us regularly with a small amount, you will need a Paypal account to set up a monthly subscription. Click here to donate.
  2. Patreon: this is a well-known membership platform that connects content creators with supporters. Mainly, it offers financial tools that let supporters subscribe to projects that give creators a predictable income stream as they continue to create content. Click here to subscribe and support us regularly.

If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

2 Comments

  1. The neighbours’ objections to this plan have always seemed to me to exaggerate the issues to a degree that took away all credibility from their concerns and made it look like plain old fashioned NIMBYism.

    • An interesting reply from someone with a business interest in the development of the library and the proposed area, a comment that is clearly driven by ones own gains.

      Facts are facts, as the well written piece above explains, people are not against a redevelopment, however what needs to be taken into consideration during such proposals, are the guidelines and recommendations that exist, meaning that any new development, no matter where in London it is, should consider the affects on people’s day to day lives.

Comments are closed.