Author: Cyril Richert
Developers are now seeking permission to build up 3 more storeys on top of their towers and platform to reach 24 storeys (in fact 25 with the size of the podium) and provide 299 residential units (up from 21 storeys and 254 units).
While the Council approved planning application 2015/0881 to demolish Homebase on 198 York Road, and replace by 6, 7, 9, 11 and 21 storeys to provide 254 residential units (read our article > HERE), developers are now submitting numerous changes to their initial plans.
They took advantage of the Summer period to submit a Screening Opinion (p.a. 2017/3699) request for the erection of 3 buildings (2 x 8 storeys and 1 “up to 24 storeys” + basement) to provide 299 residential units; followed (as obviously they did not get any objection by the deadline of 08/08) on August 8th by a full planning application 2017/4380 requesting:
Erection of a podium building with three buildings above (providing part 2, 6, 8, 11 and 24 storeys plus basement level) to provide 299 residential units including affordable and market housing, with circa 5,943 sq m of Class D1 education space, including 537 sq m of associated Class A3/A4 café and drinking establishment space…. etc.
Funny enough, the council’s website said that comments must be provided until 31/07/2017.
A farce? Step by step modification in order to get approval for a controversial plan
If you were looking for approval for a massive development, likely to cause scrutiny, what would be the best option? Surely flooding the system with multiple amendments would be a good option as this would result on:
- detracting most objection comments from the public, unable to focus on all changes;
- minimising changes in view of previous approvals and passing easily the Planning Application Committee scrutiny (variation of condition may be approved by officers under delegation of power).
See the list of main modifications below (we don’t display numerous applications on details such as drainage, demolition management, etc) :
- p.a. 2015/0881 registered 03/03/2015: Podium building with three buildings above (providing part 6, 7, 9, 11 and 21 storeys plus basement level) to provide 254 residential units. >> APPROVED 14/07/2015
- p.a. 2016/5747 registered 11/10/2016: Variation of condition: increase in residential units from 254 to 275 and proposal to include a dance academy … etc >> APPROVED 14/12/2016
- p.a. 2017/3699 registered 18/07/2017: Screening opinion request for the erection of 3 buildings (2 x 8 storeys and 1 “up to 24 storeys” + basement) and an adjoining podium level, to provide 299 residential units … etc
- p.a. 2017/3886 registered 25/07/2017: Variation of condition: reduction in size of Blocks A and B; Changes to the ground and first floor podium façade; Changes to the façade on Block C … etc.
- p.a. 2017/4380 registered 08/08/2017: Erection of a podium building with three buildings above (providing part 2, 6, 8, 11 and 24 storeys plus basement level) to provide 299 residential… etc.
If it is a joke, I doubt that local residents will find it funny…
UPDATE 23/03/2019: As expected, we are reaching at least 24 storeys!
Not only Wandsworth Council is known for approving planning applications in breach of local policies, but developers can be confident that the size of their scheme can be increased nearly un-noticed through mutiple planning applications (see below).
From the initial screening application 2015/0231 registered 19/01/2015 with a 20 storey-tower, to p.a. 2017/4380 registered 08/08/2017 for 24 storeys plus basement level, it took 4 years to see the actual size being erected.
There are currently 18 planning applications for the site from 2015/0881 to 2018/5903 (with the first 5-7 regarding major amendments to the scheme) and still going on….
Did you like reading this article? Help us writing more!
Clapham Junction Insider (formerly called CJAG website) has been publishing local news for more than 14 years and remains committed to providing local community information and public interest journalism.
We aim to feature as much as possible on community campaigns and initiatives, local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents and helping residents.
We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more.
Until recently, all stories, analysis and reports published have been made with the great help of many volunteers. However, at the end of the day it cost time and efforts and we are frustrated that we cannot do more: there are many subjects that we would like to cover but we need financial resources to help us providing regular information.
We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.
2 ways of supporting our project
Do you think what we are doing is helping the community and you want to encourage us to do more? We have set up two ways of supporting our project:
- Paypal: For one-off contributions, you can just use your bank card. However if you wish to encourage and support us regularly with a small amount, you will need a Paypal account to set up a monthly subscription. Click here to donate.
- Patreon: this is a well-known membership platform that connects content creators with supporters. Mainly, it offers financial tools that let supporters subscribe to projects that give creators a predictable income stream as they continue to create content. Click here to subscribe and support us regularly.
If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.
As a long term resident in Lombard Road, I am horrified as the skyline is filled in with more and more high buildings. No greenery – or greenery above ground level even. Who is profiting from this building boom? Not locals residents. The way these buildings are approved over the objections of residents is scandalous.