Winstanley and York Road Regeneration

3 mins read
2
Winstanley and York Road area subject to redevelopment

In March 2013, a spokesman for the Council said:

“We want to help bring about more positive changes in the area and are prepared to commit up to £100m to help achieve this as part of the Winstanley and York Road regeneration project.”

So here we are. A specialist masterplanning team has been appointed to work alongside the community in creating new development proposals. The team includes property consultants GVA and architects Levitt Bernstein.

The Council is now presenting four different improvement proposals for the Winstanley and York Road estates and asks for your views on their relative pros and cons. According to the Council’s website, these options are not fixed, and they could be blended and combined to form a new outline plan for the area.

According to the a booklet produced by the project teams-open-day-exhibition-boards, what the residents want is:

  1. Improved homes with fewer towers
  2. Improved York Gardens and open spaces
  3. Employment opportunities
  4. A better range of shops
  5. A better range of facilities
  6. Better streets, open spaces and play areas
  7. A safe and attractive neighbourhood for people of all ages

There are 4 options:

  1. Original OptionOriginal Plan: Retain and Refurbish the existing buildings with new homes along Grant Road (Better Shops, Improved Homes, New Station Piazza, New Homes along Grant Road, Improved Winstanley Road).
  2. Winstanley Redevelopment - Option 1Option 1 – Moderate change: Develop York Road Estate but retain all three Towers (New and Improved Homes New Station Piazza, New Homes along Grant Road, Improved Winstanley Road, More Homes and Housing Choice Better and Safer Streets).
  3. Winstanley Redevelopment - Option 2Option 2 – More change: Develop York Road Estate and a few of the Winstanley blocks but retain all three Towers (New and Improved Homes, New Station Piazza, New Homes along Grant Road, Improved Winstanley Road, More Homes and Housing Choice, Better and Safer Streets, An improved Park & Facilities, Better Play and Public Spaces, A New Leisure Centre, New and improved Shops, New Health Centre).
  4. Winstanley Redevelopment - Option 3Option 3 – Greater change: Develop York Road Estate and more of the Winstanley blocks and retain two Towers (New and Improved Homes, New Station Piazza, New Homes along Grant Rd, Improved Winstanley Rd, Better and Safer Streets, An improved Park & Facilities, Better Play and Public Spaces, A New Leisure Centre, New and improved Shops, A New Health Centre, More Homes and Housing Choice, A New Park with scope for New Play and Recreational Facilities).

The original “refurbishment” scheme is meant to cost around £20 millions. As we’ve be told by a member of the housing department, the Council is prepared to borrow (meaning it will have to be paid back) up to £100m in addition to the £20m, to fund redevelopment plans.

Architects think that there is a scope for tall buildings near the town centre

All options include sticking out 2 towers just meters away from Clapham Junction bridge, at the corner of Falcon Road/Grant Road. 2 others behind.

winstanley_towers_proposalThe two tallest towers of Falcons estate will stay, as they have been sold and are currently owned privately. With the new plan, it will be 6 of them. Who said that the local residents wanted less towers?

Architects think that the site is close to the town centre (actually just adjoining Clapham Junction town centre AND conservation area) and therefore the location is auspicious.

All tenants re-housed locally

Council tenants will be offered an alternative home on a social rent within the new development or in the local area. Resident leaseholders and freeholders
will be offered the market value of your property, plus 10% (or 7.5% if they are not residents). More information on this page.

Wandswort Guardian reported concerns of a group of leaseholders and home owners, living in the Ganley Court buildings, as they would see their home destroyed with Option 3:

Maria Clara Abreu Barbosa, 46, of Ganley Court, said the council have offered her a flat in exchange for the house she owns if option three goes ahead.

She said: “Ganley Court is lovely. It is fantastic, we have a front garden, it is amazing. It is very hard to find a house like that.

“I don’t understand how come they want to destroy a historical building in a beautiful area.”

The consultation is running for six weeks and started at the beginning of November. There will be another drop-in session on Wednesday 20 November, 10am-1pm at York Gardens library.

As everyone is saying, this is just a very open proposal at this stage, concentrated on the redevelopment of the estates. However there has been little talks on the redevelopment of the area beside the railway, and no option has been proposed but the same twin towers.

You can contact the project team and let them know your favourite options and concerns by email: winstanleyyorkroad@wandsworth.go.uk

In January 2014, the plan is to organise a public exhibition of what could be possible with the preferred options.

The council plan to begin building work from 2016 which will take up to 15 years.

Did you like reading this article? Help us writing more!

Clapham Junction Insider (formerly called CJAG website) has been publishing local news for more than 14 years and remains committed to providing local community information and public interest journalism.

We aim to feature as much as possible on community campaigns and initiatives, local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents and helping residents.

We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more.

Until recently, all stories, analysis and reports published have been made with the great help of many volunteers. However, at the end of the day it cost time and efforts and we are frustrated that we cannot do more: there are many subjects that we would like to cover but we need financial resources to help us providing regular information.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

2 ways of supporting our project

Do you think what we are doing is helping the community and you want to encourage us to do more? We have set up two ways of supporting our project:

  1. Paypal: For one-off contributions, you can just use your bank card. However if you wish to encourage and support us regularly with a small amount, you will need a Paypal account to set up a monthly subscription. Click here to donate.
  2. Patreon: this is a well-known membership platform that connects content creators with supporters. Mainly, it offers financial tools that let supporters subscribe to projects that give creators a predictable income stream as they continue to create content. Click here to subscribe and support us regularly.

If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

CJI editor and Clapham Junction Action Group co-founder and coordinator since 2008, Cyril has lived in Clapham Junction since 2001.
He is also funder and CEO of Habilis-Digital Ltd, a digital agency creating and managing websites and Internet solutions.

2 Comments

  1. It is against human rights!!!I am a freeholder and they want to take our houses to build big blocks.We are going to fight for our houses with our private gardens, where we can grow our vegetables and our flowers!!!.
    M.Clara Barbosa – Ganley Court

  2. I am also a freeholder and bought my property based on the large amount of light that it gets, benefiting from being South facing with a front balcony. I live in Sendall Court just opposite Clapham Junction station and currently there is only a car park in front of the building. All plans have a long 5 story building all along Grant Road which will obstruct the sun from the first floor. Sad Face.

Comments are closed.