Network Rail said: CJ has received already a lot of money, don't expect more in the next 10 years!

5 mins read

Author: Cyril Richert

Meeting with Network Rail – 21 January 2010 – 1pm-2.30pm

Paula Haustead [Network Rail – in charge of delivering plans for CJ]
Lucy Norton [Network Rail]
Chris Wiggan [Network Rail]
Cyril Richert [CJAG]

1- Current situation
They have been deeply disappointed by the recommendation for refusal coming from the planning officers for the planning proposal from Metro Shopping Fund (Delancey). They said that (contrary to our sources) there was no plan for Clapham Junction before the Twin Towers (I was told not to use those cursed words) Delancey’s plan. Actually Network Rail (NR) worked since CP2 (Control Period 2 – funding period 2001-2004) and for 5 years (2004-2009) with Delancey and the Council to come up with a proposal. They also said that it was part of their instruction from Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) to work with third parties and private investors.  The total cost of that study was £2m!
They are currently spending money on a new entrance (Brighton Yard entrance) which  will hopefully direct 30% of the flow of passengers entering or exiting the station at St John’s Hill currently. According to projections of ORR  it should cover up to the year 2026 when the same level of congestion currently experienced will be observed again.
The East London Line will arrive in platform 2 (instead of 1 as originally planned) and wCJ-platform1ill be sharing with the over-ground. Platform 1 will stay unused as it is. However they are likely to keep the track in case it is needed in the future.
Plans for Heathrow link are still under discussions and there is no confirmation that it will stop at Clapham Junction (again, this is not what we heard).
The number of overground trains going to and coming from Willesden Junction should double (NR proposes to restore double track to the “Latchmere Curve” during the summer of 2010. This will enable the frequency of overground services to Willesden Junction to be increased to 4 trains per hour from 2011).
2- On going improvements
The cost of the new entrance is £1.5m with £500k coming from the government, £300k from the Council (not redirected from the Exemplar Scheme as we might have suspected previously) and £700k coming from various funding, including TfL and London Heritage (?). NR made very clear that it was the only station in the all country with “Access for All” scheme providing a new entrance.
From the £2m planned for cosmetic improvement (repainting, lightening, canopies,…) some will be redirected to pay for the Brighton Yard entrance (as a cost example, a single ticket barrier is £30k). The global funding for Brighton Yard was overseen by an industry group called The Clapham Junction Forum made by NR, London Underground, TfL, SWT, Southern.
Lifts are currently installed on all platforms (part of the “Access for All” government policy). Original funding from the government was £8.5m but they think now that costs will exceed this amount. Work is meant to finish in June 2010 and at the same time a temporary “smaller” station entrance for Brighton Yard will be opened (example of what it coult be in the picture below).
Brighton Yard - new entranceBrighton Yard - new station location
I asked them about the possibility to create a stair-case at the level of Brighton Yard entrance, coming from St John’s Hill (see current plans from NR HERE) to avoid going all along to reach the vehicle entrance. However they explained that:

  1. it is about 6m high and it seems to much;
  2. it would mean reallocating/6 month notice for the shop under the arches at the point;
  3. they do not have the funding.

They had some delays as they needed to destroy a café on platform 15/16 to install the lift. However as the whole station is in the Conservation area, it took an extensive (and difficult) 6 month period to get the necessary authorisation. Although the bridge is not listed, this experience makes it really unlikely that they will look for more amendments in the future.
Bus stops won’t be reallocated (road to narrow) but an additional bus stop will be created before the entrance coming from Wandsworth town.
The £20m allocated to platform lengthening and straightening at CJ is no longer considered necessary and goes back to the pot of funding for all Sussex lines! They managed to realign the platform 15/16 without the land that was meant to be provided with Delancey’s plan (no talks about platforms 11/12 and 13/14 which were in funding period CP4 2009-2013 – p63).
3- Presentation to Lord Adonis, January 20th
The Transport Secretary wanted to know what is happening after his announcement. At the meeting he requested (January 20th) were representations for the 10 stations included in the plan. Cllr Edward Lister (leader of Wandsworth Council) was also attending the meeting.
They confirmed that Clapham Junction has been defined as the most in need along with Manchester Victoria station (receiving £10m apparently). A decision was made to concentrate on a few major improvements instead of spreading the funding on a lick of paint (although you could spend £2m repainting CJ station, they said).
As was reported by Martin Linton before, they suggested spending the funding on facilities for passengers inside the station, mainly platforms 9/10, 11/12, 13/14:

  • Canopy extension.
  • Waiting rooms.
  • More staff.
  • More stairs (from the overpass).
  • Repairs on subway.

No plans for station concourse, entrance refurbishment/extension.
As we already urged Lord Adonis to better use the funding for providing a more ambitious vision on the future of the station, I was told that:

  1. they were presented with reports (from South West Train?) from passenger demands for better platforms
  2. extending canopies will avoid people packing at the same points under adverse weather conditions and therefore will improve train usage
  3. NR has a mission to focus on train users and passenger needs, not residents. Therefore they shouldn’t be the prime initiator for CJ station regeneration.

I was told that those proposals were supported by South West Train, Southern, TfL and Wandsworth Council (Cllr Lister). You will notice that I asked if the Council thinks that providing waiting rooms and canopy extension (although very welcome) are much more important than refurbishment of Grant Road for example, I was quickly answered: “No, no, that’s not what I said“.
The CJ investment paper should be signed off mid/late February.
As shown on the picture taken the day of the meeting on platform 10 at Clapham Junction, they are already installing waiting area (probably part of the £2m “cosmetic” improvements). But NR was not aware of anything and surprised when I raised the point.
4- Regeneration of the station and CP5
As Robin Gisby will be in in charge of overseeing the current improvements, Paul Plummers should be in charge of defining next funding period for 2014-2019 also known as CP5.
However, it was repeated several times, there won’t be much allocation for Clapham Junction station in CP5 as it already received a lot currently!!!
NR said they do not see the £5-10m funding provided by Lord Adonis as an emergency funding to make the station – branded second worst in the country – up to a minimum standard. Therefore it might be seen by NR as a welcomed CP5 advance funding and could explain why they now consider that they will concentrate next funding effort on other stations.
It is clear that NR considers that its priority is for passengers, not residents. They said that the local authorities should take their responsibilities if they want to regenerate the area and provide with the necessary funding. Therefore they do not intend to come forward with any plan for making Clapham Junction a better station from the outside.
Of course they welcome any element of survey or consultation that we might present, but our discussion should also involve South West Train, Southern, Tfl, and local authorities. It seems that they won’t ask for any more funding for Clapham Junction station for CP5 if the Council does not come forward with some vision of what could be done and of course a beginning of a funding. After all, even if NR provided the biggest part of Birmingham New Street redevelopment, they were only focusing on the station and it was the local authorities who developed the vision, they added.
Therefore it looks like they put the ball into Wandsworth Borough Council hands now!

Do you think what we are doing is helping the community and you want to encourage us to do more?

Your help means we can spend more time researching stories, talking to contacts, sitting through meetings and writing stories. Any money given will support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in area of Clapham Junction. Battersea, Wandsworth and around.

Support us, help us to expand: subscribe to CJI with a monthly donation


Monthly amount needed to make it sustainable:

We'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

CJI editor and Clapham Junction Action Group co-founder and coordinator since 2008, Cyril has lived in Clapham Junction since 2001.
He is also funder and CEO of Habilis-Digital Ltd, a digital agency creating and managing websites and Internet solutions.


  1. I am confused. Why do NR think there is any distinction to be made between residents and passengers? We may be a local residents group, but what we are interested in is a decent 21st centuary station which meets the needs of its passengers. CJ may be Britain’s biggest interchange, but the majority of the station’s users start or end their journeys here. The requirements of passengers and CJ residents are therefore identical.
    Building proper station buildings, extending the over-pass and/or underpass, and platform lengthening and straightening works are absolutely essential if CJ is to be brought up to standard and fit to cope with the future expansion of passanger numbers. It is insulting to suggest that these are the responsibility of the Council or part of any wider regeneration agenda. The responsibility falls squarely on Network Rail, and any scheme to address these issues should clearly be NR led.
    I am also horrified to hear that the £20 million allocated for lengthening and straightening works has been withdrawn. this leaves the station some £15million WORSE OFF than when Lord Adonis announced the emergency funding. To think that overcrowding issues will be solved by extending the canopies so that folks won’t all stand in the same place when it is raining is laughable.
    I think some more lobbying of Lord Adonis and others is urgently needed.

  2. I maintain as I always have, that significant improvements at Clapham Junction station (taken to mean the whole of the immediate site including the failed Delancey scheme) have no chance of happening without significant private sector investment and intent. For that to happen everybody just has to take on board that no investors will come forward until they think that there is a measure of agreement locally between the private, public and voluntary sectors. It’s easy to kick the private sector but there are many others responsible as well.
    What is required is a more open and effective local partnership. Several years have been wasted by the recent debacle, caused by differing and irreconcilable interests, and it’s by no means certain when there will be another chance. Until that chance emerges (and it will emerge sooner if there is a strong local partnership) local residents, businesses and visitors will have to continue much as now. Minor improvements may be possible, but really only tinkering, when a bolder, better thought out scheme would have been so much more.
    I certainly wouldn’t count on more money coming from the Government in the sahpe of Adonis now. Hadn’t anybody heard the country is virtually bankrupt? We can’t even afford proper defence of the country. The spiralling cost of government and the defence of the banks are inevitably coming home to roost and British people will suffer for some time because of it.

  3. David Rosemont>Our point is not that we shouldn’t consider (and welcome) private investments, but that NR should be at the core of the project, not only watching.
    As I gave the example of Birmingham redevelopment at the end of the meeting, NR quickly dismissed the fact saying that they were only in charge of the station.
    As we reported, the £600m project is made by £400m of public money, the rest being brought up by public investors.
    I only hope that NR was not trying to explain that their £400m for redeveloping the station was a negligible share of the project and that the station was not the heart of the scheme!
    Regarding the country being virtually bankrupt, there is a bit of an exaggeration. Albeit the financial state not being brilliant (contrary to the banks which recovered very quickly! 😉 ) we are far from the situation of the PIIGS (as the English press calls them, i.e. Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain). The British pounds might have lost 33% of its value in 1.5 years, the pressure is currently also on the euro where the spread between Germany (the best of the class) and Greece (in situation of repeating) is widening and put the system in danger.

  4. The banks are really not out of the merde yet, look at very recent events. One has to look at global power shifts which have been accelerated by the mindless greed of some City boys.
    I am expecting the euro to go down rather quicker than any regeneration of CJ is likely to happen. The UK economy has been fractured in the same way as Haiti and I’m putting 10 years on it (CJ) mon ami.
    Judging my your lack of comment on my central point about partnerships I take that as an agreement!
    Just to confirm my interest in CJ we have just invested in it, taking a ten year window of course,
    Pip pip

  5. Many statutory, political and business forums will be consulted before any plans are drawn up of course. However this is also an opportunity for local residents to have their say.

Comments are closed.