Grant Road development

1 min read
3

Author: Cyril Richert
Application for 2 buildings, 6 Grant RoadThe Council has just published the documents for the redevelopment of the site along Grant Road (Griffon House  & Lanner House 6 Grant Road SW11) involving demolition of existing buildings and construction of new building between 6-11 storeys to provide 452 self-contained studio rooms for use as student accommodation (for use of post-graduate students of Imperial College London) together with associated car and cycle parking, landscape treatment, amenity space, access and servicing facilities.
Documentation is available on the Council’s website (link here) and you can submit a comment using the form here, or write to the Council (addresses here with reference 2009/2279).
report has been published by Berkeley First (the specialist division within the Berkeley Group providing student accommodation and low cost housing), on the community involvement. As usual we regret that there is no greater consultation for such schemes which are going to impact more than a few hundred people. However the document holds good information, in perspective with the fact that a planning permission was already granted last year for the redevelopment of the area, and the new application has no more (rather less) footprint on the area.
The new impact on the vicinity seems more to be with the level of occupation and the specificity of residents (students rather than families and professionals). Concerns have been expressed on the parking issues (with only 6 on-site parking space, it is likely than more postgraduates will have vehicles/visitors even if Imperial College is 3 miles away from CJ). Furthermore, photo-montages and colour photos/drawings should be provided for the residents to assess the aesthetic impact on the neighbourhood (apparently a model of the proposed scheme and surrounding buildings was also on display at their exhibition).
A total of 186 invitation ‘flyers’ were sent out on 21 May to local residents, residents’ groups and civic organisations and the public exhibitions were held near the site at the Battersea Chapel on 3rd and 6th June 2009 and were attended by 4 local residents and 2 representatives of the Battersea Society.
A planning permission was approved last year for the previous owner (St James Home) to build 160 one and two bedroom apartments.

[Click on the pictures to see bigger]

Comparison of footprint1 - image from developer's report
Comparison of footprint2 - image from developer's report
Proposed area of construction
Shape of the buildings fromn above

Did you like reading this article? Help us write more!

Clapham Junction Insider (formerly known as the CJAG website) has been publishing local news for over 14 years and remains committed to providing information about the local community and engaging in public interest journalism.

Our goal is to feature a wide range of community campaigns and initiatives, local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, and provide assistance to residents.

We have always been dedicated to these endeavours and have no intention of changing. In fact, we would like to expand our efforts further.

Until recently, all the stories, analyses, and reports published have been made possible with the invaluable help of many volunteers. However, it requires a significant amount of time and effort, and we are frustrated that we cannot do more. There are numerous topics we would like to cover, but we require financial resources to provide regular information.

Therefore, we kindly ask our readers to consider offering financial support to sustain these efforts. Any contributions made will help support community and public interest news, as well as the expansion of our coverage in this area.

2 ways of supporting our project

Do you think what we are doing is helping the community and you want to encourage us to do more? We have set up two ways of supporting our project:

  1. Paypal: For one-off contributions, you can just use your bank card. However if you wish to encourage and support us regularly with a small amount, you will need a Paypal account to set up a monthly subscription. Click here to donate.
  2. Patreon: this is a well-known membership platform that connects content creators with supporters. Mainly, it offers financial tools that let supporters subscribe to projects that give creators a predictable income stream as they continue to create content. Click here to subscribe and support us regularly.

If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

CJI editor and Clapham Junction Action Group co-founder and coordinator since 2008, Cyril has lived in Clapham Junction since 2001.
He is also funder and CEO of Habilis-Digital Ltd, a digital agency creating and managing websites and Internet solutions.

3 Comments

  1. It will be difficult for the Planning Applications Committee to go against the precedent it set for itself last year by allowing the previous application BUT it is nevertheless the case that local residents are concerned about the impact of having 452 units on this site. I have been collecting signatures for a petition in the three blocks most directly affected, namely Sendall, Shaw and Clark-Lawrence where the two major objections have been about the possible traffic and parking implications and the sheer size of the buildings and hence the impact on day lighting, views, etc.
    The residents think that the developers are trying to get too much on the site and I agree with them.

  2. I’m a local resident (of SW11) and believe this propsal is fine – there are not traffic problems on the north side of Clapham Junction and there is no reason to object to medium height buildings on an estate that has the self same medium height buildings.

  3. The developers are propsosing to chop down a number of mature trees to make way for this development. This green space in this already very dense urban area is extremely precious, the developers should be made to develop the area in such a way as to preserve the trees and to be in keeping with the current buildings which it will replace. There is now saturation high rise development within the Wandsworth Borough and no more should be encouraged or allowed, especially as this proposal is to house students outside the borough.

Comments are closed.