Misleading image

1 min read
MSF proposal showing only the station redevelopment.

The developers are advertising their redevelopment proposal at Clapham Junction station and ask for our support (above).

Despite their communication tricks efforts, residents aware of the plan know that the station redevelopment represents less than 20% of the total amount they are proposing to invest in the scheme. The main part of it being two 42 storey towers:

Twin towers from severus road Scale model of the twin towers at Clapham Junction

Towers from Debenhams and TK-Maxx Tower aboveFalcon

So, who is displaying misleading images?

Did you like reading this article? Help us write more!

Clapham Junction Insider (formerly known as the CJAG website) has been publishing local news for over 14 years and remains committed to providing information about the local community and engaging in public interest journalism.

Our goal is to feature a wide range of community campaigns and initiatives, local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, and provide assistance to residents.

We have always been dedicated to these endeavours and have no intention of changing. In fact, we would like to expand our efforts further.

Until recently, all the stories, analyses, and reports published have been made possible with the invaluable help of many volunteers. However, it requires a significant amount of time and effort, and we are frustrated that we cannot do more. There are numerous topics we would like to cover, but we require financial resources to provide regular information.

Therefore, we kindly ask our readers to consider offering financial support to sustain these efforts. Any contributions made will help support community and public interest news, as well as the expansion of our coverage in this area.

2 ways of supporting our project

Do you think what we are doing is helping the community and you want to encourage us to do more? We have set up two ways of supporting our project:

  1. Paypal: For one-off contributions, you can just use your bank card. However if you wish to encourage and support us regularly with a small amount, you will need a Paypal account to set up a monthly subscription. Click here to donate.
  2. Patreon: this is a well-known membership platform that connects content creators with supporters. Mainly, it offers financial tools that let supporters subscribe to projects that give creators a predictable income stream as they continue to create content. Click here to subscribe and support us regularly.

If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

CJI editor and Clapham Junction Action Group co-founder and coordinator since 2008, Cyril has lived in Clapham Junction since 2001.
He is also funder and CEO of Habilis-Digital Ltd, a digital agency creating and managing websites and Internet solutions.


  1. Cyril>
    There are a number of images which have been generated of the scheme, including views of the tall buildings from near, middle and far distance (indeed one of the earliest images released showed the towers in their entirety at sunset).
    Not every poster will show all images, and furthermore Metro have the right to display the proposals in their best light.
    I find it inconceivable that anyone commenting on the scheme at this stage (whether for or against) could be unaware of what the Clapham Junction redevelopement would entail. This is due not only to your endeavours, but primarily Metro’s own extensive consultation programme and Wandsworth Council’s own consultation.
    Your continued insistence that legitimate, extensive efforts to garner support (as legitimate and extensive as your opposition operation) amount to ‘tricks’, is not worthy of your campaign.

  2. Brendan> According to most objections received by the Council after your latest issue of the “Beat”, it seems that most people won’t agree with you unfortunately.
    And I bet that some might be surprised to read that according to you their knowledge on the proposal “is due primarily [to] Metro’s own extensive consultation programme”.

  3. Speaking personaly,a long time ago, I went to the small display on show behind the station which wasn’t well advertised and was closed at the times when most people were using the station and was only there for a few hours and for about 4 (if that) days. I made horrified comments at the time and asked questions.
    A very, very long time later, simply because I was waiting for a friend at the station, I spotted Wandsworth’s poster behind me with what I think are very flattering, understated pictures of your scheme. I was totally taken by surprise and hastily made it my business to find out what was going on and make sure I broadcasted the information as quickly as possible to eveyone I knew. I rang the Council and complained the lack of information Battersea residents had been given, talked to Mark Hunter and was horrified to suss out what sort of deal was being proposed. We certainly saw no sign of an ‘extensive consultation programme’.
    Why don’t you produce some designs that the community will be in favour of? The only reason anyone would put up with your designs is because they would like improvement at ANY price…it is not because anyone WANTS ugly tower blocks.
    But most people are not that desperate and as you can see they will fight for as long as they have to get you to change your plans. The station is Network Rail’s responsibilty; any other development should be viewed as a separate item.

Comments are closed.