On 12 November 2008 the Mayor’s office issued a planning report to Wandsworth Council giving a barely qualified green light to the Clapham Junction Scheme. The full document is available HERE.
The full document makes terrifying reading! In summary, the Mayor approves the design of the towers finding them “attractive city elements contributing positively to the London skyline”. Rather confusingly, he also adds that they would have “minimum impact on locally important views or views of listed buildings. The buildings do not feature in any strategic views.”
He cannot have it both ways: either the buildings have minimal impact, or else they tower over the skyline. Clearly the latter is true, as the 42-storey shiny stainless steel towers will stand on the crest of the London escarpment and be visible for miles around.
These comments are unbelievable coming from the man who, before his election, vowed to put a stop to Ken’s ‘phallocratic towers’ and claimed that the previous Mayor was intent on ‘wrecking London’s skyline’. We can only assume that he personally had no hand in writing it. However, his office’s report on Clapham Junction adds to the recent accusations of ‘flip-flopping’ in response to the proposed ‘three ugly sisters’ development at Waterloo, and the skyscrapers at Ram’s Brewery, both of which Mr Johnson initially opposed (during his campaign) but now supports (once elected).
The report concludes that, although the scheme does not presently comply with the London Plan, some minor adjustments could be made which would overcome any objections. These require:
- The developers to show that the re-provision of lost office space is not economically viable;
- Further consideration as to whether any affordable housing can be provided, possibly at the expense of scaling down the station development (paragraphs 33 to 36);
- A children’s play area for the (optimistic) projection of 38 under-5s living in the 556 mostly one and two bedroom flats (note: only 8 family sized units of three bedrooms are planned);
- Further information and discussion regarding disabled access;
- The provision of power points for electric cars and ‘green’ walls or roofs to meet targets on sustainability;
- Fewer car parking spaces to meet targets on reducing car use (therefore allowing the occupants of the towers to park hundred vehicles in nearby streets?).
We wonder what utopian world the author of this report is living in delivering this politically motivated agenda? Affordable housing is to be welcomed – goodness knows, the area could do with more teachers and nurses – however should this really be at the cost of the only promise that might make this development worthwhile for the local residents? The proposed station development is already meagre, consisting of two shiny new entrances and escalators. There are no plans to replace the rickety old overpass and the shortcut through the underpass will be closed to access and not redeveloped. Nor will the developers be doing anything to provide lift access to platforms or to reduce the dangerous gaps on Platforms 15-17. These measures are being left to the taxpayers through Network Rail.
And with only 239 car parking spaces presently proposed for 556 flats, it is already clear that the occupants of the towers will be jostling for places on nearby roads. How will the reduction of car parking spaces possibly help?
The Mayor’s report also contains some glaring inaccuracies, including:
- That the towers will have 39 storeys, whereas 42 are actually planned (the same number as the Nat West Tower) [as shown on the developer’s website]
- That Network Rail has no plans to redevelop the station until at least 2019. In fact, Network Rail’s Strategic Plan already includes proposals for new station entrances and improved access to platforms by rafting over the station within its current funding period (2006-14).
- That Clapham Junction is not a significant office location. In fact there are 6050 m2 of office space within the station complex alone which will be demolished as part of the re-development. Many businesses operate in the area contributing to its vibrant local economy and even the American Embassy will be moving to nearby Nine Elms in the next few years.
The Mayor’s report is a consultation report and does not provide a final decision on the scheme. Following the Council’s consideration of the scheme at its committee in February, the developers will be referred back to the Mayor, who will then issue a final decision. At this stage all consultation responses that the Council has received will be reported to the Mayor.
The Mayor must be persuaded to honour his election commitments and listen to the people of Battersea who are overwhelmingly opposed to the construction of tower blocks in our vicinity. Please copy all of your comments to the Council to the Mayor’s office on firstname.lastname@example.org (and maybe also Sarah Thomas, Principal Strategic Planner – Planning Decisions Unit, email@example.com). As he once said: “When I look at some of the plans for the phallocratic towers that Ken wants to erect in the suburbs, I wonder whether we have learned anything from the experience of the last 50 years.” We agree. Please get writing! (and don’t forget that the press is also always keen to know your view).
Did you like reading this article? Help us writing more!
Clapham Junction Insider (formerly called CJAG website) has been publishing local news for more than 14 years and remains committed to providing local community information and public interest journalism.
We aim to feature as much as possible on community campaigns and initiatives, local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents and helping residents.
We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more.
Until recently, all stories, analysis and reports published have been made with the great help of many volunteers. However, at the end of the day it cost time and efforts and we are frustrated that we cannot do more: there are many subjects that we would like to cover but we need financial resources to help us providing regular information.
We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.
2 ways of supporting our project
Do you think what we are doing is helping the community and you want to encourage us to do more? We have set up two ways of supporting our project:
- Paypal: For one-off contributions, you can just use your bank card. However if you wish to encourage and support us regularly with a small amount, you will need a Paypal account to set up a monthly subscription. Click here to donate.
- Patreon: this is a well-known membership platform that connects content creators with supporters. Mainly, it offers financial tools that let supporters subscribe to projects that give creators a predictable income stream as they continue to create content. Click here to subscribe and support us regularly.
If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.