As we said in previous articles (HERE and THERE) Wandsworth Council has done an appalling job in drafting the latest Local Plan. Not only the document is disorganised and filled with meaningless concepts and lack of structure, but this is a huge miss-opportunity to work with the community groups.
In January 2021, Andrea Kitzberger-Smith (Planning Policy and Design Team Manager) said: “It is the opportunity to say if we got it wrong“, as she explained that due to Covid, they have drafted the document mostly internally, without the possibility to go out and visit sites. Have they taken this opportunity to dedicate time liaising with local group and community activists who know really well their area and could provide useful feedback in advance? Not at all!
As a result, the document attracted huge criticism from societies and community groups. They commented saying “the Plan as currently drafted is poorly structured, inconsistent and incoherent“, it “does not represent a proper basis on which to determine policies and strategies for the next fifteen years” or “there is no attempt to relate the 23 policies for the area to the fourteen principles and themes set out in the overall Placemaking Strategy [and] there is huge overlap and repetition across the 23 policies“; CJAG said that it “appears to be a mix of political agenda and wishful thinking“. The Wandsworth Society has not even bothered to respond to the final consultation!
However, at the Planning Forum meeting in July, Jenifer Jackson, Assistant Director for Planning & Transport Strategy in Wandsworth, denied any wrong doing, commenting that “nothing significant” came out of the comments. This straight forward judgement is not only a lot of contempt on the comments done by the community group and Societies, but also showing a very poor consideration of the work done.
CJAG is helping to fill the gaps in the policies
A local resident said “It looks like the site specific sections of the local plans were redacted by some intern over the summer, with poor knowledge of the area and no review“. Fortunately, the Battersea Society, Lavender Hill For Me community forum and CJAG have sent detailed comments to make the policies more robust.
As we wrote in our submission, the Area Strategy section for Clapham Junction “should be read in conjunction with Lavender Hill For Me community group suggestions and the Battersea Society submission, which have both produced a detailed analysis of the area“.
We have compiled those different contributions and present below sections of information that should be included into the Local Plan for more robust guidelines (obviously we focused around Clapham Junction only).
With the following links, you will have direct access to the different sites (all articles accessible on CJAG.org):
- Area Strategy for Clapham Junction and York Road/Winstanley Regeneration Area
- Site Allocations: CJ1 ASDA, LIDL and Boots sites, Falcon Lane, SW11
- Site Allocations: CJ2 Clapham Junction Station Approach, SW11
- Site Allocations: CJ3 Land on the corner of Grant Road and Falcon Road, SW11
- Site Allocations: CJ4 Land at Clapham Junction Station, SW11
- Site Allocations: CJ5 Winstanley/York Road Regeneration Area, SW11
- Site Allocations: CJ6 Territorial Army Centre, 27 St John’s Hill, SW11
Did you like reading this article? Help us writing more!
Clapham Junction Insider (formerly called CJAG website) has been publishing local news for more than 14 years and remains committed to providing local community information and public interest journalism.
We aim to feature as much as possible on community campaigns and initiatives, local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents and helping residents.
We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more.
Until recently, all stories, analysis and reports published have been made with the great help of many volunteers. However, at the end of the day it cost time and efforts and we are frustrated that we cannot do more: there are many subjects that we would like to cover but we need financial resources to help us providing regular information.
We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.
2 ways of supporting our project
Do you think what we are doing is helping the community and you want to encourage us to do more? We have set up two ways of supporting our project:
- Paypal: For one-off contributions, you can just use your bank card. However if you wish to encourage and support us regularly with a small amount, you will need a Paypal account to set up a monthly subscription. Click here to donate.
- Patreon: this is a well-known membership platform that connects content creators with supporters. Mainly, it offers financial tools that let supporters subscribe to projects that give creators a predictable income stream as they continue to create content. Click here to subscribe and support us regularly.
If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.