Does Wandsworth lie about its record of affordable housing provision?

2 mins read

Wandsworth officers in charge of the draft Local Plan write:

“There is a strong record of affordable housing provision in the borough with 885 new affordable homes delivered between 2016/17 and 2018/19.”

For any observant of Wandsworth planning approval in recent years, this statement seems to contradict the general perception of the local trend. Even the Mayor of London seemed to think that Wandsworth was not meeting it’s target on affordability. In 2018, officers told us that, although they were not prepared when this topic was challenged by the Mayor of London to justify approval for the Homebase-Swandon Way scheme, they since double checked figures and found the borough meets its target (in general terms).

Reality is: it’s not true! Wandsworth has missed 4 out of 5 times its global target

The London Plan is setting annual targets for London boroughs. As per Wandsworth Core Strategy 2016: “4.189 The SHMA 2012 identified a shortfall of 942 (58 per cent) affordable/social rent units and 686 (42 per cent) intermediate housing units. Given that this is very close to the London Plan 2015 requirement of 60% social/affordable rent and 40% intermediate, the Council will adopt the London Plan requirement.”

However, for the period 2015/16 to 2019/20, the Council decided that the target should only be nearly the exact opposite: 38% social/affordable rent and 62% intermediate.

More importantly, according to the latest Authority Monitoring Report (AMR) figures show that Wandsworth record on providing affordable housing is very weak.


For the purpose of demonstration, we have recalculated the completed housing provision by tenure for Nine Elms (VNEB) and the rest of Wandsworth and compared with the current policy target of 15% affordable in VNEB and 33% in the rest of the borough.




[1] Target of 40% of total affordable units completed, based on theoretical affordable calculation vs completed with 15% for VNEB and 33% for the rest of the borough, 10 units and more.
[2] Target of 60% of total affordable units completed, based on theoretical affordable calculation vs completed with 15% for VNEB and 33% for the rest of the borough, 10 units and more.
[3] Global theoretical affordable target for Wandsworth borough based on completed units
[4] Percentage of reaching the target.

We used conditional formatting to present in red figures missing the targets and in green when it reaches the target and over.

Between 2015 and 2020, Wandsworth missed its overall target of Social/Affordable Rent units in all years except one (and every single year if we exclude VNEB) as shown in the table above.

The average net completions on sites outside VNEB with developments of 10 or more dwellings, against Local Plan affordable mix targets, taking into account intermediate, is 25%, considerably below the 33% target[1].

For the whole borough, taking into account VNEB, it is only 20%. We have calculated that, with VNEB lowest percentage, and according to the total completion, it should be around 25%.

As those figures are known from the planners[2], we are surprised they write the opposite in their document.

[1] Core Strategy Adopted March 2016: the level of affordable housing which would be viable on individual sites of 10 plus units (gross) – at least 15% in Nine Elms, 33% in the remainder of the borough.
[2] Core Strategy, p115 (4.183)


Did you like reading this article? Help us write more!

Clapham Junction Insider (formerly known as the CJAG website) has been publishing local news for over 14 years and remains committed to providing information about the local community and engaging in public interest journalism.

Our goal is to feature a wide range of community campaigns and initiatives, local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, and provide assistance to residents.

We have always been dedicated to these endeavours and have no intention of changing. In fact, we would like to expand our efforts further.

Until recently, all the stories, analyses, and reports published have been made possible with the invaluable help of many volunteers. However, it requires a significant amount of time and effort, and we are frustrated that we cannot do more. There are numerous topics we would like to cover, but we require financial resources to provide regular information.

Therefore, we kindly ask our readers to consider offering financial support to sustain these efforts. Any contributions made will help support community and public interest news, as well as the expansion of our coverage in this area.

2 ways of supporting our project

Do you think what we are doing is helping the community and you want to encourage us to do more? We have set up two ways of supporting our project:

  1. Paypal: For one-off contributions, you can just use your bank card. However if you wish to encourage and support us regularly with a small amount, you will need a Paypal account to set up a monthly subscription. Click here to donate.
  2. Patreon: this is a well-known membership platform that connects content creators with supporters. Mainly, it offers financial tools that let supporters subscribe to projects that give creators a predictable income stream as they continue to create content. Click here to subscribe and support us regularly.

If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

CJI editor and Clapham Junction Action Group co-founder and coordinator since 2008, Cyril has lived in Clapham Junction since 2001.
He is also funder and CEO of Habilis-Digital Ltd, a digital agency creating and managing websites and Internet solutions.