Author: Cyril Richert
Paris organised an exhibition (Paris Haussmann – Modèle de ville – Pavillon de l’arsenal 31 January-7 May 2017) about the Haussmann buildings, their achievement and examples in terms of modern architecture.
The renovation of Paris was a vast public works program commissioned by Emperor Napoléon III and directed by his prefect of the Seine, Georges-Eugène Haussmann, between 1853 and 1870 (the project was actually extended up to 1927). It included the demolition of overcrowded medieval neighbourhoods, the building of wide avenues, parks and squares; and more than 40,000 homes were built in this period! Haussmann established a list of strict rules such as:
- standard ratio between the height of the buildings and the width of the streets;
- buildings should not be more than six stories high (including attic rooms) and roofs should have a 45 degree pitch to allow daylight to reach the sidewalks;
- standards about the façade’s look.
Who would think of the Second Empire’s layout as exemplar network for mobility? And of the 19th century blocks as high functioning tool for today’s city life? Of the Haussmann building as an archetype of flexibility? Those are questions raised by this exhibition. With more than 100 drawings, maps, mockups and photos, the exhibition (organised by architects Umberto Napolitano, Benoit Jallon and Franck Boutté) analysed the constructions and aimed at explaining why this incredibly dense construction is not seen as cramped but rather comfortable.
Plain and empty spaces well thought out
The French newspaper Le Monde published an article where it explains why the density (21,000/km2 compared to London: 5,518/km2, and greater than Tokyo, Seoul or New York) is “acceptable and accepted“. Umberto Napolitano says that “some recent areas of lower density generate a greater apparent density and therefore much less accepted by their residents“. The article says that in the Haussmann block, plain and empty spaces are well thought out. Space does not surround the buildings as in many contemporary constructions, but courtyards provide this inside the blocks.
Haussmann blocks are compact but relatively narrow and shallow. While modern buildings have often a depth of much more than 10 meters, often up to 20 meters (in the case of towers), the Haussmann building shows a depth all along the building of 7 to 13 meters maximum. In the article the architect says: “The narrow layout encourages double or triple exposure in the flats. Thus this allows important access to air and natural light. Ceiling, 3 meters high minimum, increases the perception of sunlight. Those are qualities of comfort that make density acceptable“.
Modern projects don’t fit into the layout of the city
Built with the same standards and strict rules in terms of dimension and aesthetic, it gives some unity to the city. Franck Boutté says that “this unity is missing in contemporary projects which, as interesting as it can be, sit beside each other without fitting into the layout of the city”
Isn’t it what we read about Nine Elms? Rowan Moore, Observer architecture critic and author of Why We Build, says the new buildings don’t speak to each other. Deborah Orr wrote in the Guardian that Nine Elms’ developments are “forming what can only be described as an architect-off. A building from Norman Foster will jostle next to one from Frank Gehry, which will rub shoulders with one from Richard Rogers.“
And the whole exhibition is in full contradiction with views such as New London Architecture chairman Peter Murray who said last year that meeting the expected population boom “will inevitably demand more tall buildings“.
Did you like reading this article? Help us writing more!
Clapham Junction Insider (formerly called CJAG website) has been publishing local news for more than 14 years and remains committed to providing local community information and public interest journalism.
We aim to feature as much as possible on community campaigns and initiatives, local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents and helping residents.
We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more.
Until recently, all stories, analysis and reports published have been made with the great help of many volunteers. However, at the end of the day it cost time and efforts and we are frustrated that we cannot do more: there are many subjects that we would like to cover but we need financial resources to help us providing regular information.
We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.
2 ways of supporting our project
Do you think what we are doing is helping the community and you want to encourage us to do more? We have set up two ways of supporting our project:
- Paypal: For one-off contributions, you can just use your bank card. However if you wish to encourage and support us regularly with a small amount, you will need a Paypal account to set up a monthly subscription. Click here to donate.
- Patreon: this is a well-known membership platform that connects content creators with supporters. Mainly, it offers financial tools that let supporters subscribe to projects that give creators a predictable income stream as they continue to create content. Click here to subscribe and support us regularly.
If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.