Author: Cyril Richert
According to an article published in the Architects’ Journal, Hawkins\Brown (Peabody’s Architects), AHMM, BDP, Terry Farrell and Wilkinson Eyre have been shortlisted to look at resurrecting the multi-million pound redevelopment of Clapham Junction in south-west London. Apparently, Collado Collins, the architect of the previous scheme, is not taking part.
Three years after it was forced to withdraw a controversial £400 million twin towers scheme, the Land Securities and Delancey-owned joint venture has decided to select the five practices to look at redeveloping the Clapham Junction train station shopping centre with a view to appointing one to carry out a feasibility study. They said:
“The Metro Shopping Fund can confirm that it has spoken to a group of architects with a view to one of them being appointed to carry out a study to assess the feasibility of development at Clapham Junction station. This process is at a very early stage and should in no way be seen as an indication that the Fund will be undertaking development at the station either now or in the future.“
MSF has not contacted the Clapham Junction Action Group at any time. However they should be well aware of our view as we published a full study with ideas and proposals on this website last year. And they should also remember the overwhelming reaction caused by their previous proposal and the way it ended.
As reported by the Architects’ Journal, the Council said:
‘A private development scheme could help to solve some of the underlying problems and we would expect the plans to complement the town centre environment.’
There is absolutely no doubt that all eyes will be watching the fate of the plan presented by Peabody, to see what direction to take for the station. After all, Hawkins\Brown, one of the architect selected, did not see any controversy in proposing a 21 storey towers for the Peabody site at the top of St John’s Hill 2 years ago.
If Peabody’s proposal is approved as it stands currently with 12-10 tower blocks and 60% higher density, we can expect 15, 20 or even bigger towers for the station with the imagination of architects (42 storeys did not appear out of place for the developers!) and a little Croydon on its way for Clapham Junction.
Did you like reading this article? Help us writing more!
Clapham Junction Insider (formerly called CJAG website) has been publishing local news for more than 14 years and remains committed to providing local community information and public interest journalism.
We aim to feature as much as possible on community campaigns and initiatives, local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents and helping residents.
We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more.
Until recently, all stories, analysis and reports published have been made with the great help of many volunteers. However, at the end of the day it cost time and efforts and we are frustrated that we cannot do more: there are many subjects that we would like to cover but we need financial resources to help us providing regular information.
We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.
2 ways of supporting our project
Do you think what we are doing is helping the community and you want to encourage us to do more? We have set up two ways of supporting our project:
- Paypal: For one-off contributions, you can just use your bank card. However if you wish to encourage and support us regularly with a small amount, you will need a Paypal account to set up a monthly subscription. Click here to donate.
- Patreon: this is a well-known membership platform that connects content creators with supporters. Mainly, it offers financial tools that let supporters subscribe to projects that give creators a predictable income stream as they continue to create content. Click here to subscribe and support us regularly.
If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.