AGM of the Battersea and Wandsworth Trades Union Council

3 mins read

Author: Cyril Richert
Trades councils are often very important organisations in an area if, like the Battersea and Wandsworth one, they are active. They bring together trade union branches in the area to campaign on relevant issues, particularly jobs, pay etc.
The Battersea and Wandsworth Trades Union Council held their General Council meeting in January (see report below) and their AGM on Monday 9th February at 7.30pm at the PCS HQ, Clapham Junction.
The meeting concluded with an address by Imogen Radford from the No Towers in Clapham Junction Campaign who discussed the impact this development would have on local jobs.

Author: Imogen Radford
I went along to the AGM/General Council and spoke briefly to the meeting developing the points below:

Clapham Junction development: impact on the local economy
Talk to Battersea and Wandsworth Trades Council 9 February 2009
Summary of the plans

  • Two tower blocks with 550 one and two-bedroom luxury flats
  • Shops – lots more around the station
  • Station improvements
  • Demolish PCS, Moss Bros etc


  • Jobs
    • Loss of 400 to 500 in offices, secure, permanent jobs, well-paid.
    • Many new jobs claimed for the new shops.
  • Local businesses
    • Loss of business from the 400 to 500 staff, and 350 visitors a week to PCS for example, shops, pubs, restaurants etc.
    • Loss of prestige of having trade union and company headquarters in the area.
  • Local economy
    • Less stable employment in shops, more vulnerable to recession
    • A less mixed workforce, fewer well-paid staff
    • Higher proportion of people who only live in the area and work elsewhere, particular impact on the daytime economy, making the shopping area are vulnerable to competing areas which retain more of a mix and more employment locally.
  • Impact on local community
    • Impact of about 1000 new residents, possibly in buy to let flats, transient population, making less of a contribution to the local community
    • Insufficient facilities in the community – schools, hospitals, sewerage and drainage
    • Insufficient improvement of the station to cope with this growth in use
  • Transport
    • Insufficient improvement of the station to cope with further growth over the next 20 years
    • Congestion for pedestrians, as underpass closed, bridge only access to platforms, and insufficiently increased areas for movement
    • Station access less easy, as the entrance near the junction will be closed, and access only possible from Grant Road and much further up St John’s Hill
    • Parking insufficient for the number of flats, so people will park in nearby estates and streets
    • No increase in buses provision to cope with the extra numbers of residents
  • Impact on the area of inappropriate buildings
    • Conservation area, massive impact on the character of the area of inappropriate design of buildings, disproportionate sized tower blocks, modish other buildings
  • Lost opportunities
    • The planned improvements to the junction and pavements might not go ahead
    • Local NHS plans for a health centre might not go ahead, medical Centre in the development insufficient and absolutely no discussion with NHS
    • Network Rail work to improve the station might not go ahead (other than the lists installation already underway)
  • Wasted opportunities
    • Lack of a Wandsworth wide strategy on development in the area, so piecemeal proposals unconnected, including Putney towers turned down, Wandsworth towers agreed, hotel plans for Falcon Road?, Clapham Junction development?
    • Lack of a Clapham Junction wide strategy for improving the town centre, so not taking account of local business, economy, community etc, just reacting to this proposed development
    • No London wide strategy on tall buildings. Mayor of London inconsistent and contradictory in his approach
    • Potential for employment in Clapham Junction missed and lost by this proposal – very accessible area (13th most accessible in London, apparently)
    • Transport strategy not joined up
    • Connection between Clapham Junction and Heathrow?
    • More imaginative use of the station site, especially as it is partly up on a hill
    • Major redevelopment of the station to cope with increased growth, linked with the local area

What we can do: Raise in your branches

  • Objection e-mail/letter to Council
  • Attend planning meeting once date known (12 March or 16 April?
  • Local MPs and councillors
  • Mayor of London
  • Petition
  • Comment on website
  • Keep up-to-date on the website
  • Help with the campaign


  • Campaign leaflet
  • MPs newsletter
  • Item on website about the response of business
  • My e-mail about impact on PCS employee
  • New leaflet due out soon from the campaign

The response was very positive and interested.
There were people there who clearly had a lot of very interesting knowledge about Wandsworth, and talked for example about how Wandsworth Council deals with section 106/planning gain [CR: article here]. Basically they bank the money, we don’t see any improvements that benefit the local community, and this just keeps the council tax down.
They routinely do not require developers to include affordable housing.
And there is a massive oversupply of housing in the area — it is turning into a dormitory area. There have been 30,000 new dwellings built since 1992. Demolishing commercial property and replacing it with housing.
There are 3000 unsold dwellings in the borough, and there is a particular development in Plough Road, Wimbledon, where it is 60% unoccupied. Clapham Junction development will just add to this glut.

Did you like reading this article? Help us write more!

Clapham Junction Insider (formerly known as the CJAG website) has been publishing local news for over 14 years and remains committed to providing information about the local community and engaging in public interest journalism.

Our goal is to feature a wide range of community campaigns and initiatives, local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, and provide assistance to residents.

We have always been dedicated to these endeavours and have no intention of changing. In fact, we would like to expand our efforts further.

Until recently, all the stories, analyses, and reports published have been made possible with the invaluable help of many volunteers. However, it requires a significant amount of time and effort, and we are frustrated that we cannot do more. There are numerous topics we would like to cover, but we require financial resources to provide regular information.

Therefore, we kindly ask our readers to consider offering financial support to sustain these efforts. Any contributions made will help support community and public interest news, as well as the expansion of our coverage in this area.

2 ways of supporting our project

Do you think what we are doing is helping the community and you want to encourage us to do more? We have set up two ways of supporting our project:

  1. Paypal: For one-off contributions, you can just use your bank card. However if you wish to encourage and support us regularly with a small amount, you will need a Paypal account to set up a monthly subscription. Click here to donate.
  2. Patreon: this is a well-known membership platform that connects content creators with supporters. Mainly, it offers financial tools that let supporters subscribe to projects that give creators a predictable income stream as they continue to create content. Click here to subscribe and support us regularly.

If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

CJI editor and Clapham Junction Action Group co-founder and coordinator since 2008, Cyril has lived in Clapham Junction since 2001.
He is also funder and CEO of Habilis-Digital Ltd, a digital agency creating and managing websites and Internet solutions.